The Korean Peace Process and the Four Powers by Tae-Hwan Kwak

Author:Tae-Hwan Kwak [Kwak, Tae-Hwan]
Language: eng
Format: epub
ISBN: 9781138715776
Google: _VNOtAEACAAJ
Goodreads: 39232366
Publisher: Routledge
Published: 2003-12-01T00:00:00+00:00

Notes

1 For insightful historical overviews of that involvement from various perspectives, see Frank Baldwin, Without Parallel: The American-Korean Relationship Since 1945 (New York: Pantheon, 1973); Claude A. Buss, The United States and the Republic of Korea: Background for Policy (Stanford: Hoover Institution, 1982); Don Oberdorfer, The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1997).

2 For coverage of North Korea’s acknowledgement, the reasons behind it, and its preliminary impact, see Peter Slevin and Karen DeYoung, ‘N. Korea Reveals Nuclear Program’, Washington Post, October 17, 2002; David E. Sanger, ‘U.S. Not Certain If North Korea Has The Bomb’, New York Times, October 17, 2002; Robert Marquand, ‘No Crisis in North Korea-Yeť, Christian Science Monitor, October 25, 2002; unattributed, ‘North Korea’s nuclear programme; Getting the Genie Back into the Bottle’, The Economist, October 26, 2002, pp. 38–39; Eric S. Margolis, ‘North Korean Bombshell’, The American Conservative, December 2, 2002, pp. 19–21; Robert Marquand and Howard LaFranchi, ‘North Korea plays its nuclear card’, Christian Science Monitor, December 13, 2002; and Doug Struck, North Korea Says It Will Renew Work At Reactors’, Washington Post, December 13, 2002. See also the author’s initial (October 2002) analysis: ‘North Korea’s Nuclear Acknowledgement: Motivation and Risks’, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, Center for Contemporary Conflict’s Strategic Insights on the Internet at <www.ccc.nps.mil>.

3 For analyses of those comparisons, see Carla Anne Robbins, David S. Cloud, and Greg Jaffe, ‘Bush’s Strategy Is Complicated by North Korea’, Wall Street Journal, October 18, 2002; Glenn Kessler and Peter Slevin, ‘No One-Size-Fits-All: The Administration Treats Iraq and North Korea - Both on the Axis of Evil - Differently’, Washington Post (Weekly), October 28/November 3, 2002;.Elisabeth Bumiller, ‘Bush Sees Korean Nuclear Effort As Different From Iraq’s’, New York Times, October 22, 2002; and Barbara Demick, ‘N. Korea Poses Dilemma That Parallels Iraq’, Los Angeles Times, December 14, 2002.

4 Washington’s lack of enthusiasm is examined in Mike Allen, ‘Bush Pledges Diplomatic Approach To North Korea’, Washington Post, October 22, 2002; James P. Pinkerton, ‘War Clouds Again Shield N. Korea’, Los Angeles Times, October 24, 2002; and Daniel Schorr, ‘Is Big Stick Giving Way to Soft Talk?’, Christian Science Monitor, October 25, 2002.

5 For conservative advocacy of a tougher approach by the Bush administration to North Korea, see Michael Judge, ‘North Korea’s Dr. Evil’, Wall Street Journal, October 15, 2002; editorial, ‘Pyongyang’s Nuclear Blackmail’, Wall Street Journal, October 18, 2002, Chuck Downs, ‘Kim Jong-il: Unfit Even For Dictatorship’, Wall Street Journal, October 21, 2002; Bill Gertz, ‘Lawmakers Ask Bush To End Accord’, Washington Times, October 31, 2002; editorial, ‘Kim Jong-iľs Sunset’, Far Eastern Economic Review, November 7, 2002; and James T. Hackett, ‘North Korea Ripe For Change’, Washington Times, December 2, 2002.

6 For scholarly appraisals of that history, see Kim Hak-joon, Unification Policies of South and North Korea: A Comparative Study (Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1978); and Choy Bong-youn, A History of the Korean Reunification Movement: Its Issues and Prospects (Peoria, IL: Institute of International Studies, Bradley University), 1984.

7 The author assessed that ambiguity in greater detail in his Toward Normalizing U.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.